May 16, 2011

Supes OK ‘depot-like’ structure for RR park

Media Gallery News
 | 
SUPPORTERS of the El Dorado Depot gather to recreate an historical photo from around 1920. Many of the supporters pictured here volunteered to clear brush and clean up the area surrounding the depot. Photo by Jason Bross
SUPPORTERS of the El Dorado Depot gather to recreate an historical photo from around 1920. Many of the supporters pictured here volunteered to clear brush and clean up the area surrounding the depot. Photo by Jason Bross
Long-time local rancher Ed Hagen lives near the proposed Railroad Park in El Dorado. In fact his ranch and property are found on both sides of the railroad tracks that used to connect Camino and Placerville to Sacramento. Back on March 8,  it came to the attention of the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors that Hagen had taken it upon himself to begin constructing a model of an old-time, railroad freight shed near the original El Dorado train depot.
In fact, Hagen told the board at the time that he had custom-ordered much of the lumber to be used for the construction and that it needed to be used sooner rather than later.
County Department of Transportation Director Jim Ware told the board at the same time that he had directed Hagen, in effect, to cease and desist due to concerns that the structure may have been “in the middle of where an authorized one needs to be, and then we have a problem.”
Supervisors grumbled about government getting in the way of citizens trying to do good deeds but backed Ware’s decision for the time being.
Tuesday, the board rewarded old-fashioned individualism when it authorized locating the now-completed building from the railpark parking lot onto “or near the original depot site on the SPTC-JPA right-of-way near the town of El Dorado.”
The structure, approximately 36 feet long by 18 feet wide and about 15 feet high at its peak, looks just like an authentic railyard building. It is painted a pale yellow and sports tan trim and gingerbread struts holding up the oversized eaves. It currently rests under a large oak tree on top of log skids and jury rigged stacks of scrap wood at each corner. A concrete foundation upon which it could fit has been constructed about 100 yards east of the El Dorado Community Hall.
On Tuesday’s board agenda, Supervisors Ray Nutting and Jack Sweeney had recommended that the supervisors “consider” a five-point proposal that could lead to formally installing the building at the railpark site.
First was “discuss approval of Ed Hagen’s proposal to move his reproduction to, or near, the original depot site.” Next: Consider a “fee waiver,” that is consider not charging Hagen or others for use of the county’s property. Third: “Discuss with staff the process necessary to move forward.” Fourth: Forward board direction to the Joint Powers Authority for consideration” (El Dorado County shares jurisdiction over the railroad right of way with the Sacramento Placerville Transportation Corridor Joint Powers Authority) and Fifth: “Direct staff to implement the board’s intent and return with the appropriate agenda items as necessary.”
A sixth point was added to the motion that received unanimous approval — that county counsel study and review all the preceding directives before any final decision is made.
Sweeney, who represents El Dorado as part of District 3, opened the discussion in praise of independent citizen action and against a “government that has got so hung up on red tape compared to when we used to be able to get things done. People will get to enjoy their trip to El Dorado, even though it’s not quite accurate as a replica.
“The business of government is to take risks, and we are taking risks,” Sweeney challenged.
Several members of the audience spoke in favor of the proposal. Kathleen Newell reminded the board that the “building is temporary and that people should be able to start enjoying it.”
Sue Taylor, a building designer from Camino, offered her services as well as those of other volunteers to “make the building compliant” with building codes or other regulations.
Other perspectives, however, were also in evidence.
Bob Smart, a member of the county’s Parks and Recreation Commission, who has been a significant force for development of the El Dorado Trail as well as a strong advocate for the region’s culture and history, registered strong disapproval.
“I would urge you to vote no on this,” Smart cautioned. “There’s been no meetings of people who have concerns. We’ve got to start doing things differently, not just (going along with) whoever gets to the Board of Supervisors first. Why are they letting this one guy do something when there are a lot of people out there who are not being considered?”
Smart’s concerns, however, were overshadowed by board Chairman Ray Nutting’s nostalgic and emotional description of the project.
“I’m utterly amazed at the ‘can do’ attitude out in El Dorado,” Nutting said, remarking on the work of numerous volunteers. “Imagine the stories that will be told for generations about that effort. (We can) make it part of our future and let those stories be told.”
Keith Berry, president of the El Dorado Western Railroad Foundation, a subdivision of the El Dorado County Historical Museum, and a prime mover of the effort to re-establish railroading in El Dorado County, called the completion of Hagen’s building a “wonderful expression of the community trying to make something on behalf of the community. It’s a fine presentation of a historical railroad design.”
Berry was quick to point out also that the work was not a “railroad project,” but rather the work of Ed Hagen who “assembled a qualified team of volunteers from the skilled trades.”
“I really believe he did a great job even though the building is still considered just temporary,” Berry continued. “And as times continue to be so challenging for the public sector and there is a new world order of economics, the county will probably have to rely more on the volunteer sector. How the county administers that process (remains to be seen).”
Berry said his investigations suggest that the historical depot was farther east than the foundation for the new building and that consequently, there is “no space conflict with the historical building.”
On the downside, however, he described a recent meeting of the Joint Powers Authority as a “three-ring circus” regarding the actual legal ownership of the railroad tracks. And tipping his hat to county supervisors for “working their magic;I look forward to seeing the legal decision as to who owns the track,” Berry said.
DOT’s Ware told the Mountain Democrat Wednesday afternoon that while there’s no conflict between the new foundation and the original depot’s location, “I can’t encourage people to go out and build on or remove anything from county property — that would be the same wrong.”
He acknowledged that while Hagen may not have observed all the customary steps typical to making use of public property, “It was well-known that he was going to do it and there was a conceptual” description of the building and the foundation.
Ware further explained that his direction from the board as of Tuesday is “to facilitate making that happen, and I fully intend to work toward having the building put on that foundation.”
Friends of the El Dorado Trail spokesman Mike Kenison spoke positively not only about the building but about the volunteer effort it took to get the project done. He said the location of the structure should have no effect on future siting of the trail.
“We are volunteers as he is, and he’s done some incredible things. We certainly want to see volunteers making things happen. The building is pretty cute, and it’s a great place to offer train rides,” Kenison said and added that Hagen had reached out and offered the trails folks use of the building as well.
Ware further explained that his direction from the board at this point is open-ended, that is, there is no date-certain when he should return to update supervisors on the progress of the issue.
E-mail Chris Daley at cdaley@mtdemocrat.net or call 530-344-5063.

Short URL: http://www.mtdemocrat.com/?p=68732

May 08, 2011

My turn: Tear down the El Dorado County Courthouse


Special to the Democrat

If the county of El Dorado would tear down the historical Main Street, Placerville, Courthouse it could sell the building material and build a new trail. Does this sound crazy to you? Well Ñ this is essentially what a few well intended but misdirected individuals have proposed to the Board of Supervisors in suggesting that the county tear out the 122-year-old Placerville Branch of the Sacramento Valley Railroad to speed up the building of a trail.
Not a trail for equestrians, or a mountain bike trail, but only a paved trail. And what is more disturbing is that the supervisors have entertained this presentation, whereby this group would take control of public assets owned by all county taxpayers, then turn them over to a commercial salvage enterprise. The salvage company would haul off these assets for their profit; some estimates suggest that the value of the rail could exceed $1 million.
Now you might be thinking that I donÕt see the need for a multi-use trail system in El Dorado County. I am a regular user of the Forni Road to Missouri Flat trail. I have observed the number of people who use this trail on a daily basis, and I believe that I have a reasonable understanding of who these people are and what they are doing. The overwhelming majority of trail users are walkers and joggers, who travel between one and four miles per day. I see an occasional bicycle, and once in a great while a horse will pass by.
While on the trail, I have talked with many of the trail users and I often ask them the same question: Does the trail have to be flat, in a straight line, or could it run with the lie of the land and meander along the railroad track? The answer is nearly always the same: It just doesnÕt matter as long as we have a place to walk and ride.
In 1991 the county of El Dorado, city of Folsom, county of Sacramento, and Regional Transit formed a Joint Powers Authority for the purpose of purchasing the Placerville Branch of the Sacramento Valley Railroad from the Southern Pacific Company. This allowed the preservation of the railroad right of way as a transportation corridor. However, prior to the purchase the Southern Pacific Company had removed the mainline rail between Missouri Flat Road and the city of Placerville.
In 2003 the El Dorado County Board of Supervisors approved the Sacramento-Placerville Transportation Corridor Master Plan. This plan was written over a two year period with input from a steering committee of local residents and advocacy groups interested in multiple uses of the trail, including excursion rail based programs, hiking, equestrian use and bicycling.
The master plan is specific about preserving the historical aspects of the corridor, and with great detail defines how trails will co-exist with rail operations on the corridor that is between 60 and 200 feet wide and 28 miles long.
During the planning process five public meetings were held at varying locations throughout the county to give the public input into the process. This master plan remains in effect as approved; the countyÕs Transportation Master Plan and Bicycle Circulation Plan also reflect the same statements regarding use of the corridor.
In 2009 the Board of Supervisors approved the concept plan for the construction and development of the El Dorado County Historic Railroad Park in the town of El Dorado. The Railroad Park would then be operated by the El Dorado County Museum for the purpose of displaying and operating a collection of railroad artifacts, by utilizing the former Placerville Branch line to provide a living history program. Riders would then relive the experience of rail transportation as it was from 1888 until passenger service ended in the 1950s.
The El Dorado County Historical Museum is operated by the county with one employee and a large contingent of dedicated volunteers who conduct tours, perform archive work and perform restoration of the historic rail artifacts at the museumÕs shop on Placerville Drive. All restoration work has been funded through private donations.
In June of this year I contacted Supervisor Jack Sweeney on behalf of the County Historical Museum where I have been a volunteer for the past 21 years. I asked Supervisor Sweeney to consider a resolution allowing the Museum to begin operating its rail based equipment between Mother Lode Drive (Mother Lode Y) and Missouri Flat Road. This would facilitate the re-certification of the track at no cost to the county taxpayers. In addition, the resolution designated the Museum administrator as the countyÕs representative to oversee the Railroad Park and Living History Railroad operation, thereby streamlining the process of access and development through efficient county administration. The resolution was requested on behalf of all those who frequently come to our MuseumÕs Engine House and ask, ÒWhen will it run, and when can I ride?Ó
During the Board of Supervisors meeting where the resolution was presented, Supervisor Sweeney was accused by members of the bicycle group of trying to slip something in below the radar, to sneak in a plan to which the public had not commented. The theme was to request more studies, take more time, and send the resolution before the Trails Advisory Commission and the Parks and Recreation Commission. They stated they have their own options, and they must be considered negotiators in these county matters. All of this regardless of the fact that the county Department of Transportation has grant funding pending to design and build a new paved and natural trail parallel to the tracks!
Well, I donÕt have a college degree but I do know a few things. I know that in order to operate a train, we must have two rails, and the rails must be continuous from beginning to end. I also know that if the tracks are removed it will be cost prohibitive to ever put them back, so when the trails (bicycle) people tell me that we have to negotiate for the use of the railroad I have wonder what they mean: Do we modify our equipment to use just one rail? Do we remove just some of the tracks? Do we remove it from the ends or from the middle? Do we get enough to move the train forward and backward? According to our bike folks, we just need 40 feet of old track and a rusty locomotive in El Dorado for kids to play on. Oh, by the way Ñ the supervisors have stated that they do not want to remove the track. They just want to make sure that all the recreational venues are provided for on behalf of our entire community.
So let me recap. We have a contiguous, operable railroad system that runs from Missouri Flat Road to the city of Folsom. Excepting two minor locations west of Shingle Springs, the track is in exceptionally good condition. The transportation corridor averages 100 feet wide, more than sufficient to build a Class 1 paved trail, a distinct equestrian trail, and a mountain bike single track, while retaining the historical railroad as is stated in all of the countyÕs transportation documents. As mentioned, a grant has been applied for by El Dorado County to develop the trails adjacent to the tracks from Missouri Flat Road to El Dorado and for the development of the Railroad Park. This would provide the township of El Dorado with this communityÕs first park, and trails will continue west as sequential grants are awarded.
Please join me in calling/writing your supervisor and ask what he or she can do to further protect and support the historical Placerville Branch line. Please do not obstruct this project by placing further unnecessary delays to study what has already been studied at taxpayer expense. DonÕt be persuaded to tear down and sell off our historical legacy and community artifacts ala yard sale bartering. All recreational corridor venues deserve our countyÕs best planning and we should stick to the established, approved plan.
Edward Cunha has been a volunteer with the El Dorado County Museum for 21 years.
Short URL: http://www.mtdemocrat.com/?p=15884

May 04, 2011

JPA agrees to a 5 year lease for the P&SVRR



On May 2nd, the JPA voted to pass the five year lease for the P&SVRR to run excursion trains.  The member agencies(Folsom, Sac County, El Dorado County) have to ratify the lease.  El Dorado County is currently looking at removing most the rail in their county.  The corridor is very wide (100 Ft. in most places) so there is plenty of room for everyone, trails and excursion railroad.  El Dorado County will vote on whether to move forward with removal of this 150 year old historical railroad on May 17!  We need your help in making sure the railroad is preserved for future generations.   It is connected to the 1st railroad ever to be built west of the Mississippi back in the 1850's!  


Everyone, everywhere has a voice and can make a difference in this.  
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
1) EMAIL & CALL each Supervisor:


Stating the importance of the Rail line in El Dorado County to you.
District 1 – John Knight – bosone@edcgov.us | (530) 621-5650
District 2 – Ray Nutting – bostwo@edcgov.us | (530) 621-5651
District 3 – Jack Sweeney – bosthree@edcgov.us | (530) 621-5652
District 4 – Ron Briggs – bosfour@edcgov.us | (530) 621-6513
District 5 – Norma Santiago – bosfive@edcgov.us | (530) 621-6577
THANK YOU FOR YOUR SUPPORT IN PRESERVING THE LINE!  

May 02, 2011

Rails Reconnected Over Previous Washout Area Near Latrobe California

Pictures By Don Lee

Thanks to everyone that helped out with this and the crew that installed the culverts. There will be equipment rolling over it for the first time this Saturday.  What an incredible ride it is from Folsom to Shingle Springs!  If you have not seen it yet, I highly recommend checking it out.  There are numerous outings coming up and the heavy equipment is being prepared to pull trains up the hill.  Stay Tuned!